Predicting the influence of atmospheric environment through different meteorological superposition

The purpose of the atmospheric environmental impact assessment is to calculate and analyze the prediction results of the agricultural environmental monitoring instrument, to scientifically and quantitatively answer the questions about the degree of impact, the scope, the frequency, and the environmental acceptable level of the construction project on the ambient air quality for the project construction and Environmental management provides a reference. One of the main contents of the atmospheric environmental impact assessment is the prediction of ambient air quality for each evaluation point through simulation calculations. At present, many prediction simulation methods and software based on meteorological and topographic data have been developed at home and abroad, and are widely used in domestic environmental assessment. Using the current prediction model to simulate the diffusion of atmospheric pollutants in the environment, affected by many sources of uncertainty such as strong source of pollution, meteorological conditions, and topographic conditions, the prediction results will have large uncertainties, and how to make predictions closer Actually, making evaluation conclusions more reasonable and credible has always been a difficult problem for atmospheric environmental impact assessment.
1 Superposition Analysis Method Discussion 2002-2008 "Technical Guidelines for Environmental Impact Assessment Atmospheric Environment" stipulates that the final environmental impact after the completion of the project = new pollution source prediction value + current monitoring value - reduction of the calculated value of the pollution source - calculated value of the replaced pollution source. For newly-built projects, the air quality in the assessment area after the completion of the project is a direct result of the project's predicted emission of pollutants discharged from the project and the current monitoring value. Although there is an error in the prediction results, the calculated concentration is often too large. The results are more conservative, and it is beneficial to protect the environmental quality in the assessment area, and there will be no case of “negative concentration” that does not conform to the objective laws.
In the technological transformation project, because the air quality prediction in the assessment area is obtained by subtracting the predicted result reduction from the current monitoring value, if there is a very large reduction in atmospheric pollutants, a negative concentration may occur. Situation. The main reason is that the model recommended by the HJ 2002-2008 guidelines adopts one-year or three-year observations of meteorological data for prediction. The forecast results are predicted values ​​under the most unfavorable meteorological conditions in long-term meteorology, and the current status is monitored. For 5-7 consecutive days of monitoring value. Due to the different meteorological conditions during the prediction and monitoring, the predicted value and the actual monitoring value will be greatly deviated, and even result in the occurrence of negative values ​​at some evaluation points after the superposition.
2 Overlay analysis of forecast results under different meteorological conditions In the following, combined with actual work, the forecast model ADMS recommended by the 2002-2008 guideline is adopted, and the atmospheric environmental impact assessment of a steel complex enterprise technological transformation project is taken as an example to predict the results under different meteorological conditions. Overlay analysis.
2.1 Introduction to the ADMS Model The ADMS model couples the latest developments in atmospheric boundary layer research. Conventional meteorological elements are used to determine the boundary layer structure. Only the conventional meteorological parameters need to be input in the model calculation to make the pollutant concentration calculation result more accurate. More credible, it can better describe the atmospheric diffusion process. A significant difference between the ADMS model and other large diffusion models is that the latest theory of the length and boundary structure of Moniu-Obukhov is used to precisely define boundary layer feature parameters. The ADMS model discards the Pasquil temperature classification and the Gaussian model, and uses the PDF model and the small-wind convection model. ADMS is suitable for rural or urban areas, simple or complex terrain.
2.1.1 Basic Calculation Formulas 2.1.1.1 PDF Mode Under low-buoyancy conditions, Weil (1984)'s PDF model is used to calculate ground concentration for low buoyancy plume.
2.1.1.2 Small wind convective scale model Under unstable conditions, the small wind convective scale model of Briggs (1985) is used for high buoyancy plume.
2.1.1.3 The Loft model uses the Weil (1991) Loft model for high buoyancy plumes under neutral conditions.
2.2 Application Examples
2.2.1 Parameters of pollution source A technological transformation of the sintering plant of a steelmaking joint enterprise in the Northwest China, a new set of sintering flue gas desulphurization equipment was built. Before and after the technical transformation, the pollution source was discharged. Terrain parameters were SRTM 90 terrain data, and the accuracy was 90 II1×90 m. The topography of the project area is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1 Terrain simulation of the project area
Figure 1 Terrain simulation of the project area

2.2.2 Analysis of calculation results (1) The meteorological parameters adopt the time-sequential and successive meteorological observation data of the small-scale meteorological station in 2008-2010, the calculation results of each evaluation point, and the superposition analysis using the long-term meteorological condition prediction results. After a large amount of reduction, superimposed status monitoring values, the concentration of l#2# and 3# points are negative. (2) The meteorological parameters shall adopt the seven-day time-sequential meteorological observation data during the local current monitoring period and the calculation results of each evaluation point. When superposition analysis is performed using the forecast results of meteorological conditions during the current monitoring period, the forecast results are close to the actual situation, and there will be no negative situation due to large reductions. (3) The comparison of the forecast results with the actual monitoring values ​​using different meteorological conditions is shown in Figure 2. As can be seen from Figure 2, the forecast results using long-term meteorological conditions are larger than the current monitoring values, and the forecast results of meteorological conditions during the current monitoring period are close to the current monitoring values, and there is no situation where the predicted value is greater than the monitored value.

Figure 2 Comparison between predicted and monitored values
Figure 2 Comparison between predicted and monitored values

3 Conclusions The forecast results under superimposed long-term meteorological conditions are compared with the forecast results under meteorological conditions during monitoring of superposition status. Because the former is the maximum value under long-term meteorological conditions, in general, it will be larger than the current monitoring value. Therefore, when predicting the environmental quality of evaluation points in technological transformation projects, it is often the case that the reduction amount is greater than the current monitoring value, which leads to the negative value of the post-retrofit evaluation points. In the latter case, since the meteorological conditions used in the forecast are consistent with the meteorological conditions at the time of monitoring, the predicted situation is close to the actual situation, thus avoiding the occurrence of negative values, and increasing the credibility of the environmental impact assessment of technological transformation projects.

Miniature Bearings:Grooved Ball Bearing - That is standard bearings with single or double deep groove outer ring(double slotted bearings),  Hot sale bearings No 625ZZ ,626ZZ, 608ZZ(double grooved bearing 608) etc .

 It is very popular for injection window roller or bathroom sliding roller easily.

  • 1. Type: Grooved Ball Bearing
  • 2. Brand Name: NMN or OEM , ect.
  • 3. Bore Class 100; HRC 55.
  • 4. Groove Depth: 0.5mm, this depth will make the plastic more well connected with the groove.
  • 5. Outer Ring: Thickest ( this could make sure the outer ring won't be broken easily.
  • 6. Cage: Steel,Brass,Nylon
  • 7. Precision Rating: ABEC-1/ P0, ABEC-3/P6, ABEC-5/P5, ABEC-7/P4
  • 8. Seals Type: open , 2RS , ZZ
  • 9. Number of Row: Single Row , Double Row10. Material: Chrome steel, Stainless steel

Grooves Ball Bearings

Grooves Ball Bearings

Grooved Ball Bearing

Grooved Ball Bearing,Miniature Grooved Ball Bearing,Grooved Plastic Bearing,Slotted Mini Ball Bearing

Hebei Naimei Bearing Co., Ltd. , http://www.nmn-bearing.com